Late 401(k) deposits are the most common operational failure payroll causes in a retirement plan, and the one that is easiest to prevent and most tedious to fix. The rule itself is short. The correction is not: it involves the Department of Labor's plan asset regulation, a lost earnings calculation, an IRS excise tax return, a disclosure on the plan's annual return, and a decision about whether to use the DOL's correction program or fix it quietly and accept the reporting consequences.
Our 401(k) payroll handbook covers the timing rule as a day-to-day control. This page assumes the control has already failed. It covers how to find late deposits, how to measure them, and what correcting them actually involves, from payroll's side of the desk.
Under the DOL's plan asset regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3-102, amounts withheld from a participant's wages as 401(k) contributions, or as repayment of a participant loan, become plan assets "as of the earliest date on which such contributions or repayments can reasonably be segregated from the employer's general assets."
Three features of that rule cause most of the confusion.
There is an outer limit, and it is not the deadline. For pension plans, the regulation says the date can never be later than the 15th business day of the month following the month in which the amounts were withheld. Many payroll teams read that as a target. It is not. It is a ceiling that applies only if your actual capability is slower than that, which for any employer using electronic payroll is almost never the case. The operative standard is the earliest date you could reasonably have segregated the money.
The standard is measured against you. If your payroll provider transmits deferrals the day after payroll for most pay dates, that pattern is the evidence of what is reasonable for your organization. A deposit made eight business days after payroll when your usual practice is two days is late, even though it falls well inside the 15th-business-day ceiling.
Small plans get a safe harbor; large plans do not. A plan with fewer than 100 participants at the beginning of the plan year is treated as compliant if the amounts are deposited no later than the 7th business day following the day the employer received or withheld them. Larger plans have no bright line at all.
The regulation's reach to loan repayments is the part payroll most often forgets. A loan repayment deduction sitting in the operating account for two weeks is a late deposit under exactly the same rule as a deferral.
Once withheld amounts become plan assets, an employer that keeps them in its own account is using plan assets for its own benefit. That is a prohibited transaction under ERISA and under Internal Revenue Code section 4975, regardless of intent and regardless of how small the amount or how short the delay.
That characterization drives everything that follows. A late tax deposit costs a penalty. A late plan deposit requires the employer to restore the plan to the position it would have been in, pay an excise tax to the IRS on the "amount involved," and disclose the failure on the plan's Form 5500, where it is visible to the DOL and, for plans that need an audit, to the plan's independent accountant.
In practice, almost every late deposit traces back to one of a short list of causes:
The DOL and plan auditors test timeliness by comparing every pay date to the date the corresponding money reached the plan's trust. Do that test yourself, for the whole year, before anyone else does.
Document the method and the result. If you find nothing, the documentation is evidence that you looked. If you find something, it becomes the basis for the correction. Our payroll audit procedures guide covers how to structure an internal test like this, and the payroll segregation of duties guide covers how to keep the person who runs payroll from being the only person who can release the remittance.
Whichever route you take, a complete correction has the same core parts:
Lost earnings run from the date the amounts were withheld from participants' pay (not from the date they became "late") to the date they were deposited, and through to the date the lost earnings themselves are paid.
The DOL's Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program publishes an online calculator for this. It uses the IRS underpayment rates under Internal Revenue Code section 6621(a)(2), which change quarterly, with daily compounding factors. The DOL maintains the table of historical rates on its site. Using the calculator is not mandatory, but under the VFCP's self-correction option, the lost earnings must be computed with it, and in practice nearly every correction uses it because the result is defensible and reproducible.
Two practical points:
The alternative measure in the VFCP, restoration of profits, applies where the employer earned more on the money than the plan lost. For most payroll delays, the calculator's lost earnings figure is the relevant one.
The Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program is the DOL's process for fiduciaries to correct specific breaches, including delinquent participant contributions and loan repayments, and receive a no-action letter. The program was updated in a final rule effective 17 March 2025.
A full VFCP application involves correcting the transaction, documenting the calculation, and submitting the application with the supporting records the program lists. The benefit is the no-action letter, which states that EBSA will not take civil enforcement action on the corrected transaction, and access to excise tax relief under Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2002-51 if the exemption's conditions are met.
A full application makes sense when the delinquency is too large or too old for the self-correction option, when it involves a pattern rather than an isolated failure, or when the employer wants the certainty of the no-action letter.
Eligibility is lost if you wait. The VFCP is not available to a plan or fiduciary that is "under investigation" as the program defines it. Once an EBSA investigation has begun, voluntary correction is no longer the route.
The 2025 update added a Self-Correction Component (SCC) for exactly the kind of small, short delay most payroll failures produce. According to the DOL's VFCP fact sheet, the SCC is available for delinquent participant contributions and loan repayments to pension plans when:
To use it, the employer computes lost earnings with the online calculator, deposits principal and lost earnings, files an SCC Notice through EBSA's web tool, and assembles a retention record, including the SCC retention record checklist and a penalty-of-perjury statement, which goes to the plan administrator to keep. EBSA responds with an email acknowledgment rather than a no-action letter.
The SCC was paired with an amendment to PTE 2002-51, also effective 17 March 2025. Under the amended exemption, a self-corrector does not have to send a notice to interested persons. Instead, it completes Form 5330 to calculate the excise tax it would otherwise owe, keeps that form, and pays the excise tax amount to the plan rather than to the IRS. The amendment also removed the earlier restriction that denied exemption relief to anyone who had used the program for a similar transaction within the previous three years.
For a payroll team, the SCC changes the economics. A single late payroll caught within a few weeks will almost always qualify, and correcting it no longer requires a full application.
An employer can also deposit the principal and lost earnings and pay the excise tax without using the VFCP at all. That is a legitimate correction, but it carries two consequences worth weighing:
For most small, recent delinquencies, the SCC now costs less effort than going outside the program.
The excise tax under Internal Revenue Code section 4975 is reported on Form 5330. According to the IRS instructions:
Two filing details have changed in recent years. The Form 5330 instructions now direct filers to Form 8868, not Form 5558, to request an extension. And Form 5330 must be filed electronically for tax years ending on or after 31 December 2023 by filers required to file 10 or more returns in the year. Confirm the current requirements in the latest instructions before filing.
The excise tax is owed by the employer as the disqualified person, not by the plan, and it should never be paid from plan assets.
Late deposits must be disclosed on the plan's annual return:
|
Filing |
Where late deposits go |
|
Large plan (Schedule H) |
Line 4a |
|
Small plan (Schedule I) |
Line 4a |
|
Form 5500-SF |
Line 10a |
Per the DOL's instructions and its Form 5500 FAQs on delinquent contributions, the total delinquent amount is reported for the year in which the contributions were late and carried forward on the same line each year until the year after the violation is fully corrected, including payment of lost earnings. The FAQs also explain that delinquencies reported on line 4a are not repeated on line 4d or Schedule G, and that the auditor's report for a large plan addresses the line 4a information, separating delinquencies corrected under the VFCP with PTE 2002-51 satisfied from those that remain nonexempt prohibited transactions.
The practical consequence for payroll: whoever prepares the Form 5500, usually the plan's third-party administrator, needs your timeliness test and correction records before the filing deadline. An undisclosed late deposit that later surfaces in an audit is two problems instead of one.
The correction is only finished when the failure cannot recur in the same way. Controls that work:
Our payroll year-end checklist is a good place to add an annual timeliness review, and the payroll and retirement plans reference page covers how deferrals interact with the rest of the payroll system.
A documented procedure is also what a reviewer looks for first. The 401(k) Procedures Manual and e-Alerts is built as a desk reference for exactly this kind of written process, and its alerts are a way to keep up when the DOL changes the correction programs, as it did in 2025.
Suppose an employer with about 60 participants runs a bonus payroll on a Friday. The regular payroll's deferrals transmit automatically, but the bonus deferrals require a manual upload, and the person responsible is on leave. The deferrals reach the trust 12 business days later.
Run that sequence within a few weeks of the failure and the whole matter is administrative. Leave it for a year and it becomes a multi-year excise tax calculation and an auditor finding.
When they are not deposited as of the earliest date the employer could reasonably have segregated them from its general assets, under 29 CFR 2510.3-102. For pension plans, the date can never be later than the 15th business day of the month after the month the amounts were withheld, but that is a ceiling, not a deadline. The real test is your own demonstrated capability. Plans with fewer than 100 participants at the start of the plan year have a safe harbor: deposits within 7 business days are treated as timely.
Yes. The plan asset regulation expressly covers amounts withheld from wages for repayment of a participant loan, on the same terms as deferrals. A loan repayment withheld from pay and held in the employer's account is a late deposit if it is not remitted when it reasonably could have been. Because loan repayments are often remitted on a different schedule from deferrals, they are a frequent source of findings, and they are eligible for the same VFCP corrections, including the self-correction component.
From the date the amounts were withheld from pay until the date they were deposited, using the DOL's VFCP online calculator, which applies the IRS underpayment rates under section 6621(a)(2) with daily compounding. Calculate each late payroll separately and allocate the result to the affected participants' accounts. The self-correction component requires the online calculator, and most other corrections use it because the result is consistent and easy to document for the Form 5500 preparer and the auditor.
An option added by the DOL in its 2025 VFCP update, effective 17 March 2025, for delinquent participant contributions and loan repayments to pension plans. It is available when lost earnings are $1,000 or less, the amounts are remitted within 180 calendar days of withholding, and neither the plan nor the self-corrector is under investigation. The employer corrects, files an SCC Notice online, keeps a retention record, and, under amended PTE 2002-51, pays the excise tax amount to the plan instead of the IRS.
Generally yes, unless the excise tax is relieved under PTE 2002-51. The initial tax is 15% of the amount involved, which for late deferrals is based on interest rather than the full contribution, and the return is due by the last day of the 7th month after the end of the employer's tax year. Self-correctors using the SCC complete Form 5330 to calculate the tax and keep it, but pay the amount to the plan.
On line 4a of Schedule H or Schedule I, or line 10a of Form 5500-SF. The total is reported for the year of the delinquency and carried forward each year until the year after full correction, including lost earnings. Delinquencies not corrected under the VFCP with PTE 2002-51 satisfied are treated as nonexempt prohibited transactions, which a large plan's auditor must address. Give your timeliness test and correction file to the Form 5500 preparer before the filing deadline.
Correction programs exist because late deposits are common, but every correction costs staff time, an excise tax calculation and a disclosure. A written remittance procedure, tested every pay date, is cheaper than all three. The 401(k) Procedures Manual and e-Alerts gives payroll and benefits teams a documented reference to build that procedure on, and for the plan-side rules behind it, see the 401(k) Training and Certification Program.
Correction program terms, calculator rates and filing rules change. Confirm the current VFCP requirements on the DOL's site and the latest Form 5330 and Form 5500 instructions before you correct, and coordinate with the plan's administrator and advisers on anything beyond a single, recent delinquency.

